<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MP3: Eternal Summers &#8211; &#8220;Fall Straight Back&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://walrusmusicblog.com/blog/mp3-eternal-summers-fall-straight-back/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://walrusmusicblog.com/blog/mp3-eternal-summers-fall-straight-back/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 15:10:51 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jordan</title>
		<link>http://walrusmusicblog.com/blog/mp3-eternal-summers-fall-straight-back/comment-page-1/#comment-4009</link>
		<dc:creator>jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 00:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walrusmusicblog.com/?p=1882#comment-4009</guid>
		<description>shit recording quality?

just because something doesnt have a high production quality, does not make it shit.

i just dont agree with that.

song sounds wonderful though</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>shit recording quality?</p>
<p>just because something doesnt have a high production quality, does not make it shit.</p>
<p>i just dont agree with that.</p>
<p>song sounds wonderful though</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://walrusmusicblog.com/blog/mp3-eternal-summers-fall-straight-back/comment-page-1/#comment-3619</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 17:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walrusmusicblog.com/?p=1882#comment-3619</guid>
		<description>everyone&#039;s right... Their are two versions of this out there.  This is an early one nicole did.  We recorded it also in the &#039;able-to&#039; sessions.  That version is on the first EP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>everyone&#8217;s right&#8230; Their are two versions of this out there.  This is an early one nicole did.  We recorded it also in the &#8216;able-to&#8217; sessions.  That version is on the first EP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael (The Walrus)</title>
		<link>http://walrusmusicblog.com/blog/mp3-eternal-summers-fall-straight-back/comment-page-1/#comment-2564</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael (The Walrus)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 20:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walrusmusicblog.com/?p=1882#comment-2564</guid>
		<description>I guess we aren&#039;t listening to the same song...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess we aren&#8217;t listening to the same song&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Some Dude</title>
		<link>http://walrusmusicblog.com/blog/mp3-eternal-summers-fall-straight-back/comment-page-1/#comment-2554</link>
		<dc:creator>Some Dude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 18:16:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walrusmusicblog.com/?p=1882#comment-2554</guid>
		<description>&quot;in this case the shit recording...&quot;  What qualifies the recording quality as shit?  Even if it is lo-fi compared to other super-HQ recording formats?  Kind of douchey, ya think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;in this case the shit recording&#8230;&#8221;  What qualifies the recording quality as shit?  Even if it is lo-fi compared to other super-HQ recording formats?  Kind of douchey, ya think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

